How I Started Digging Into This Mess
Okay, so this whole Rasputin thing kicked off when I saw this wild picture online. Showed him looking totally creepy near some fancy Russian furniture. Got shared everywhere like it was real history. Felt off, you know? His eyes looked… strange. Like a bad Photoshop job on cheap family photos people do. Decided I'd check if it was legit myself. No fancy plans, just started poking around.
My First Faceplants (Literally)
Felt pretty sure I could tell fakes easy. Big mistake. Jumped onto this big online archive, searched "Rasputin". Bam! Tons of pictures. Grabbed one showing him seriously praying, hands clasped, super intense. Figured, "Yeah, this feels old-school real." Shared it with a history buddy. Got roasted instantly. "Bro," he says, "That pose? Totally fake. Overused in made-up mystic pics." Totally embarrassed. Felt like my gut compass was busted.
Tried comparing faces. Found one photo everyone agreed was legit – this famous Rasputin stare down from a real Russian archive. Held it up next to others. Started spotting things:

- Blurry edges: Some pics had super sharp faces slapped onto blurry bodies or backgrounds. Looked like bad cutouts.
- Weird wrinkles & creases: The real pic? Lots of natural-looking wrinkles in the clothes. Fakes had smooth fabric or weird, unnatural folds. Like someone painted over it badly.
- That "melty" look: His famous beard! Real versions were messy. Fake ones? Looked too smooth, too perfect… almost like someone smeared melted cheese on his face instead of hair. Weird!
Got tricked AGAIN though. Found another image – him standing beside Tsar Nicholas II. Background matched known palace photos. Signed by a real photographer. Thought I'd struck gold. History buddy crushed me again. "Colouring's all wrong," he said. Real photos from then used specific chemical colours. This one had modern tones, too bright. Signature? Easy to forge on scanned copies. Hit me – gotta check the SOURCE photo, not some scan someone messed with.
Getting My Hands Dirty For Real This Time
Enough guessing. Decided to dig into legit sources. Found museums known for actual historical Russian collections. Looked at websites from places like the State Hermitage or old Russian photo society archives. Not just trusting any website saying "history photos." Checked the notes underneath pictures – who donated it? When was it found? If it just said "found online," chucked it out fast.
Started noticing patterns in the REAL photos:
- Grainy, Scratchy Quality: Original film from that time had texture. Fakes made later often looked too smooth or had weird digital noise instead of proper grain.
- Old Damage That Fits: Real pics had stains, scratches, rips in places that made sense for how paper ages. Fake "damage" looked painted on, placed weirdly, or was suspiciously clean around the main subject.
- Clothing & Setting Details: Dove into what priests actually wore back then in Russia. Checked types of buttons, collar styles. Real photos matched. Fakes? Might mix wrong periods or get minor clothing details hilariously wrong when you zoomed.
Big one? Shadow Direction. Found one photo claiming to be outside the Winter Palace. But his shadow pointed one way, the building's shadows pointed another. Total give-away. Real photos have consistent light.
What I Actually Use Now (Simple Stuff!)
Don't need to be a photo expert. Here's my simple method now:

- Stomach Check: Does the picture feel creepy? Not mystic creepy, but "something looks off" creepy? Trust that itch.
- Scan Don't Stare: Don't just look at Rasputin's face. Zoom in! Scan the edges where he meets the background. Check the clothes near folds. Look at random objects around him. Find one inconsistency? Warning bell.
- Background Hunt: Use reverse image search. Found that "fancy furniture" picture? Turns out the background was ripped straight from a different photo of an unrelated Russian aristocrat's drawing room. Oops.
- Shadows Are Snitches: Look at the light source. Does the shadow under his hat make sense with the shadow under the chair? Inconsistent light betrays fakes every time.
- Source Sniff Test: Where did it come from? Real museum, historical archive? Maybe good. Some random user's Pinterest board? Doubt it hard.
The Bottom Line I Keep Hitting
Finding real Rasputin pictures feels like being a detective with a blurry magnifying glass. Even legit photos look odd today! Fakes prey on us expecting history to look as fake as modern Photoshop. My biggest takeaway? Real history is messy, faded, and sometimes just plain ugly. If it looks too dramatic, too clean, or too perfectly mystical... chances are high someone made it decades later on a computer. I still get fooled sometimes – it’s frustrating! But poking at edges and questioning light saves me more often than not. Gotta stay skeptical out there!